Archive for the ‘ SharePoint ’ Category

SharePoint 2010: Architecture and Planning information

Recently I have been delivering Design and Planning Sessions at client sites, and as of recent SharePoint 2010 has been part of that mix.

After the activity that goes on during those sessions getting towards the end of them is always a cross roads for clients.  Why?  Because it is time to kick the wheels.  Remind them, and remember, this is not a 1 or 4 weeks ordeal.  This has to be very well planned.

If I am looking for information that is worth while and a great conversation starter, my landing point is the TechNet Library.  Here is focus on the Planning and Architecture documentation.  There are some great pieces of info, and a great set of planning worksheets.

Here is the link to this section … http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc261834.aspx

Site Directory in SharePoint 2010

Sometimes there are so many changes to the environment in which we work and live in that something will escape our attention.

In discussing functionality with a client today, the topic of Site Directory came up and the comment of “well, we use it but it is too bad it is not available in 2010” was made … and huge sense of huh?!? came to me.

Well, the item that escaped me came to light (and I know there are others).  So researching about it was not only an option it was/is my duty.

Found an excellent post by Bill Baer on the subject.  And not only that but there is a reference to a potential and possible solution.  This is something that is being worked on through codeplex, here is the link .. http://spsitedirectory2010.codeplex.com/

Something about Property Management or … the understanding of SharePoint Admins/roles ?!?

When I talk about SharePoint, for some reason it comes to my mind as if it were property management and all the tasks associated with it.

So, imagine you have a lot ( a piece of land of sorts), you then decide there is something you want to do with it.  So, you make the choice of having a building built.  Now, in order to go forward with your plan, you need to check what the rules/regulations are.  Has is it been zoned residential, commercial, industrial … you get the idea.  This to me sounds like Governance.  The what am I to do given a defined set of rules.

We keep on moving forward based on those rules.  And with this we start the process of building, the building process takes us to survey the land, identify what our boundaries are.  And as we go along we start getting the idea in our head as to what we will do as far as the building goes.  We identify the essentials of the building, basic services and such.  All in all, we plan.  And as with many things we do, we like solid foundations.  What a solid foundation looks like will depend on where and what we build.  The way buildings are built depends in many ways in being able to foresee the potential for natural disasters or to try to leverage the lay of the land.  Sound familiar?  We have done our Requirements Gathering.

We have the building in place, we have followed the zoning rules, we have implemented services.  But we need someone to manage the building, now we move on to the human side of the story.  We want to establish a means to normalcy in the building, someone that can be the monitoring agent as to the “what’s going on?” of it.  This person will be tasked with making sure all basic services are functional, that measures are taken if there is an issue and so on.  Enter the Farm Administrator. In a way, we establish an extension of the rules to make sure the building and the apartments/offices build follow a standard set of rules too.

Now, in turn you will have people leasing or buying the apartments/offices, they will be the keepers of that space.  So, now we are building sites, we have moved from having the building (farm) ready, to leasing/selling offices/apartments (site collections).  There will be someone assuming responsibility for those offices, that person will authorize or be informed about activities and also who not only gets a code into the building, but perhaps a key to the office.  Enter Site Collection Administrator.  And then perhaps we move on to the person that would be responsible for specifics within the office, for example a Human Resources Manager or Coordinator.  They will have specific control and knowledge about people.  A facilities coordinator, and so on.  I would translate that into Site Administrators.

With that said then, we identify the following:

Role Name Responsibility (but not limited to)
Farm Administrator Infrastructure
Site Collection Admin Policies for Content, Hierarchy, Recycle Bin, Security and Access
Site Owner
(Site Admin)
Security and Access, Training, Guidance, Manage Templates

All in all there are different levels of responsibility to be handled, but it is very important to understand what they are and what they mean.

Here is a link to very well laid out explanation on this … http://www.endusersharepoint.com/2009/08/11/site-managers-and-end-user-expectations-roles-and-responsibilities/

SharePoint Saturday Indianapolis: SharePoint Development (101 Session)

Yesterday I participated as a speaker at the SharePoint Saturday Indianapolis event.

My session was Introduction to SharePoint Development, which I renamed the 101 Session.  My goal for the presentation was to highlight that SharePoint development is more than just Web Parts. This made it a conversation worth having with attendees.

Thank you to tall that attended, and my apologies for breaking the rules on heckling.  I know the speaker is the one supposed to get it not the attendees.  But you were troopers and took it well.

I am posting my slide deck and will continue to post as I finish producing the additional content.

There were some side conversation I had around Team Foundation Server and what is coming for it in 2010.  Expect some posts around that as well.

Download Presentation

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.